![]() During that period, this expansion in the application in lockout/tagout never once crossed my radar. In this instruction, OSHA made clear to its compliance officers that they were expected to include vehicles "such as, but not limited to, automobiles, trucks, tractors, refrigeration transport vehicles, and material handling equipment" in their definition of the scope of the lockout/tagout standard.įrom 2009 to 2012, I worked as a loss control representative for a national property/casualty insurance carrier that specializes in auto dealerships and vehicle maintenance facilities as one of its niche industries. 3 for severity.Ī largely unnoticed development occurred in the practice of lockout/tagout in 2008 with the publication of OSHA's revised Enforcement Policy and Inspection Procedures for the Control of Hazardous Energy (CPL 02-00-147). See Also: Workplace Safety Management Best PracticesĪs a result, year after year, lockout/tagout makes it to OSHA's list of the top 10 most frequently cited standards, as well as the list of top 10 standards with the highest penalties. ![]() ![]() Lockout/tagout often is complex, and it can be a challenge to achieve the standard's performance-orientated goal of ensuring "that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative." Since the publication of OSHA's Control of Hazardous Energy Sources final rule in 1989, the implementation of lockout/tagout has vexed the private sector.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |